CHARITABLE FOOD
Charitable food donations after a crash has come up recently on www.survivalblog.com and also in a book I just got done with from Bruce Clayton ( an old 80’s magazine article compilation published by Paladin Press ). That was where I got the “animals are all brown” argument in the camouflage article. In the article in the book Clayton argued the merits of giving stored food as barter. In the Survival Blog article it took more of a Christian Charity tone. While both answers have their strong points I would instead argue for the more selfish approach, if for no other reason than to be different and difficult.
*
When Bruce arrived at his Super Secret small town location in California’s Sierra Nevada Mountains ( back when the state was a fit place for both man and beast to live ) his no doubt delightful mother in law blabbed to the whole place what an important survivalist writer he was. So, out go the plans to buy a few Battle Rifle Cadillac’s ( H&K 91’s for those Stone Age types that mistakenly think I’m referring to M14’s or FN-FAL’s- look, Ma, no gas fouling and near indestructible parts ) and he decides to stockpile enough to feed all his neighbors in a five mile radius. I would have bought the HK’s, shot the mother in law, her daughter too if I got any lip about it and moved to an even more remote area.
*
The idea was to trade the wheat to each household on a weekly basis and get barter in exchange, such as a normally unproductive old crone knitting a wool sweater instead of popping prunes and cashing in a Social Security check. That’s how you get these old farts to pay their way. And no, they did not pay their fair share into the system. They paid far less of the 15% I’m paying and for a shorter period of time. The average recipient now gets back everything they paid into the system their entire career in under five years of Old Bugger Welfare. 78 Friggin Million people are now or shortly going to be on this generous vote buying welfare. The old bastards are going to bankrupt us a lot faster than single moms on welfare ever could. If about one in three of the population is working and 25% are on government Job Welfare, that means every holder of a private sector job is going to have to support one friggin old worthless fart. And I don’t even ( much ) blame them, the worthless old ones who won’t have the decency of walking out into a snowstorm and relieve the tribe of the burden of feeding them. My dad is on the public teat. So if I can’t hate him for bankrupting the system I can’t hate your dad either. I hate the politicians that lived off of the scam.
*
The other argument is that you have a moral obligation to at least warn your neighbors of the impending doom. And then try to set a little aside for them when it all comes crashing down. A great idea when your close neighbors are three miles down the road. A really crappy idea for most of us that don’t live out in the country. I have over a hundred neighbors in my trailer park. I ain’t warning one of the bastards. One, they will form a lynch mob and kill me and steal my food. It will be enough to feed all of them one half a day. I keep two hundred pounds of wheat and two hundred rounds of ammunition in my trailer. The rest is in storage. If I can keep them at bay long enough with my .357 I can load up the rifle. But odds are one will be able to shoot back. Better they don’t know I have food.
*
And, to be fair, what the Hell is this Blog, anyway? I know I’m trying to make money off of it but the majority ignore my pitiful sniveling and read it for free. I am providing a public service here, warning about the coming hard times and showing you how to cheaply prepare for them. How much more charitable am I supposed to get? Aren’t I doing enough? How many people has Jim over at Survival Blog helped out by publishing his book before Y2K? I would wager tens of thousands. He got the message out to the confused and ignorant. He is still getting mail all the time thanking him for turning them on to the danger. Why should he feel obligated to help his neighbors also? At most I would give them a copy of my book at a house warming, if I were him.
*
The only good reason you should have for stockpiling food for others is so they can work it off with needed skills. And even that can backfire when they kill you, steal your food, put your wife and daughter to work in the new post-Apocalypse brothel and take over as area warlord. I don’t trust anyone past my family in that case. My dad might be old with a bad ticker but I can trust him when I go to sleep. My brother in law might agree with me on the future and still fail to prepare but I don’t mind providing for him as he is still more trustworthy than a stranger off the street, even if they are a doctor. Well, some professions are worth taking the risk. Like a chemist. They would be worth their weight in wheat.
*
Be cautious with any charity. It is noble, but until civilization stabilizes after a collapse you are risking your life by trusting strangers. And risking your family. A human being can rationalize any behavior, including betrayal and cannibalism. Including killing you and your three year old child. The traditional rationalization for Native American genocide was they occupied our land. We justify holding Muslims indefinitely without a trial because there is a slender chance they might become a terrorist. I might become a child molester, since I’m male, should you kill me before I do anything? Rational thinking will go the way of the electric grid after a collapse. Be prepared for it.
END
Saturday, December 16, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
BIGbill says:
I'm one of those friggin old farts on that "welfare". I guess I just have no shame. I was forced to pay and I am taking it while I can get it. One day you will be as old in body as you seem to be in spirit now, and you just might view things differently. I've had a few turns on the road when I needed some help, so I tend to throw a few bucks to certain charities. All I'll lose is some money and I've got so little, it ain't gonna make too much difference. It must be the CHRISTIAN upbringing I suffered, but sharing has always seemed a good thing. Don't get me wrong, I wish today's folks had more self-respect and a better work-ethic, but I ain't GOD, and it ain't up to me. Besides, we are gonna hafta tribe-up to survive shtf and a little charity can get you a lot of comrades. Be well, and Merry Christmas to you and yours.
Personally I would trust some of my neighbors much more than any of my brothers and their families. Of course I'm lucky to live on a stsreet where several of the houses have been in the same family for decades. And I am willing to help those neighbors. And my kids and their partners. Probably not anyone else.
The way I see it, we all have decisions to make in life. We have to decide what we'll do for work, where we'll live, who we'll spend our time with and how we'll spend our money. I'm big on charity in my day to day life. I've always tried to tithe a certain percentage of my income to charities that have low overhead (ie, the money goes to people who need it, not to executives who spend their time fundraising). Still, when it comes to emergencies, I have a completely different approach. I don't feel that I need to (or can afford to) stock supplies for my neighbors who buy every new gadget that comes out but would never, ever consider putting food and other supplies away for bad times. Mind you, I might chip in with others to help out a poor widow...but I'm not about to waste my time, money or invisibility by "warning my neighbors of impending dangers in our world" in order to try and get them to change their ways. All that would do with these folks is turn me into an "important to remember guy" when the rain starts to fall. I've worked hard (and sacrificed) to arrange for my family's safety and I'm not about to jepordize that by identifying myself as a survivalist or letting people know I have food to spare. When it all comes falling down I'll do my own little bit of theater by acting paniced and hungry (in public), and will complain bitterly about how "the government isn't helping us" and such rot. I'll even lose weight to fit in with those who didn't plan for trouble, and cutivate a desperate look in my eyes. While charity has it's place in everyone's life, the end of the world as we know it is a time to take care of yourself and your family. Don't let any "survival" writer con you into thinking that you've got to carry your neighbors and their families on your back too!!
wayne from canada here ....
i tend to agree with jim and with comment #3.. charity and preparedness starts with the immediate family . In a mob situation like will happen after SHTF one needs to be invisible . not everyone can go to there remote fortified gun stocked encampments ... that is unfortunately what the the other christian , trust in godder,but carry a big gun, survial writer promotes .I believe the term is yuppie survivalist.. yuk toooey.. a devout gun packing christian is a dangerous creature..one that should be watched carefully .Now i am not saying all christians are bad ,,but then not all muslums are bad either ..no no i am not a muslum. I read Mr Dankin because most of what he says hits the nail on the head ,and i love his wit.
as for charity ..warning the masses . ,just try mentioning it to some of your associates and see the looks on there faces ,some are interested .. some look at you like you are nuts and others well they dont register anything just go quiet and get a scary look on there faces,perhaps marking you as an anarcist,a trouble maker..scary stuff,i have tried ..lol probably wont again . If one is well prepared .. has all his ducks in a row ,then and only then is one be in the place to help others,family members first,then close friends..but the general pop...be warry they might have been the ones that marked you as a wacko troublemaker,and go on witch hunts.
ok ok i maybe a preparanoid but..i simply want to be ready and able to take care of me and mine when the SHTF.. not if, but when!!
thanks Jim
I have always felt that the "taking care of me and mine" attitude is what being prepared for SHTF situations was all about.
If we prepare for others that have not, where do we draw the line of giving to them after they know what we have stored?
Will we be forced to defend our cache with extreme actions to keep what is ours after the word gets out to all others?
I personally went through the LA riots and the Northridge quake and saw first hand the immediate attitude that the "humans" took towards the property and life of others.
It is sad and scary what people will do if they think that you are the easy charity mark.
Nightshift said....I agree...I have no food, weapons, and will look pitifully unprepared...Yes the Christian or better yet, humane thing to do would be to help folks out, but keep it in perspective with the event. A hurricane? stores will reopen. Total SHTF? Time to batten down the hatches. I have a select group of neighbors that I fed (and one other neighbor) during hurricane Katrina and after the response I got from some of them, a few are on there own. Only some of them pulled together for the security team we had to form and I will remember. I will not try to convert my neighbors either. Most of them do prepare for hurricane type events but not all. Only 1 set of neighbors has seen my stocks and they won't say anything couse they did not during the storm. And that was not planned....They are great allies for any type event. I will not help strangers if it will jepordize my own family. As far as weapons....they should not be a priority before food stocks but don't be inclined to do with out any for whatever reason. The most peaceful of us all may need to fight to survive and protect our families.
With regards to weapons...while it may be nice to have them (to do your fighting at a distance) keep in mind that they aren't absolutely needed. I happened to catch a break at a garage sale a while back and bought a huge collection of video instruction on the "SCARS" fighting technique. These tapes are WAY expensive to buy new so I would never have gotten them but for a stroke of luck (and a can't refuse price tag). After absorbing and practicing the very simple moves and techniques they teach (I've seen a number of martial arts videos but NOTHING like this!) I find that I've lost the ability to be physically intimidated and while I'm not the type to ever start a fight, I have no concern about being in one now. Oddly, my greatest concern in that regard now is how to do as little damage as possible. There are very subtle differences in methods that will subdue or incapacitate someone and ones that will kill them! It gives you a very odd sense of control when you know how to instantly collapse a giant of a man with a single finger (I've won several friendly bets now from very foolish friends) and it puts the whole concept of "weapons" into the realm of *theater* with which to warn off potental threats. The problem with using weapons to threaten, of course, is that it ups the ante on the part of the other fellow....he can either back down, respond in kind or take your bluff (if he's dumb enough to think you won't pull the trigger). So, weapons have become an "absolute last resort" thing for me, something that I'll avoid showing or using unless there is NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE! In the meantime, you might want to haunt eBay for some of those SCARS videos (they show up once in a while) and check it out for yourself. They'll leave you with the knowledge (as corny as it may sound) thay you're never "unarmed". Trust me when I say that its an amazing feeling!
Post a Comment